Орган местного самоуправления поселения, городского округа до принятия вышеуказанного решения формирует перечень объектов капитального строительства, фактическое состояние которых подлежит оценке. В него включаются объекты с дефектами и повреждениями, которые были выявлены в результате предварительного визуального обследования. Чтобы оценить фактическое состояние объектов, привлекается специализированная организация. С ней заключается муниципальный контракт.
Дорогие читатели! Наши статьи рассказывают о типовых способах решения юридических вопросов, но каждый случай носит уникальный характер.
Если вы хотите узнать, как решить именно Вашу проблему - обращайтесь в форму онлайн-консультанта справа или звоните по телефонам, представленным на сайте. Это быстро и бесплатно!
Содержание:
Признание дома непригодным для проживания судебная практика
Please Wait. The Appellants held a meeting on 25 th February at Mombasa, attended by over 50 Employees in the industry, and resolved to form and register their proposed Trade Union. They approached the Respondent and were issued a Certificate under Section 12 of the Labour Relations Act Number 14 of [hereinafter the Act], enabling them to recruit Members for purposes of establishing their Trade Union. Thereafter the Respondent issued Legal Notice Number on 14 th August under Section 14[1] of the Act, inviting objections to the registration of the proposed Trade Union.
The Appellants presented all the requisite documents and paid the prescribed fee of Kshs. The Board unfortunately did not give its approval to registration. This decision is the subject of the Appeal. The Appellants submit the Respondent misapprehended the law on registration of Trade Unions. The right to form a Trade Union is a fundamental right under the Constitution, which can only be restricted in accordance with the law. The Appellants submit the Respondent rejected their application based on the very reasons the Respondent had asked the Appellants to explain from the inception.
The powers conferred on the Registrar are exclusive, not to be shared with any other authority. The Appellants submit the Respondent acted ultra vires her mandate, by prescribing to the Appellants to form an Association. The Report confirms there are Trade Unions in such countries as Benin, Zambia, and Philippines, devoted to organizing Transport Workers in the informal sector. Chris Bonner points out that over the past few years the issue of workers in the informal economy has become a serious one for the Trade Union Movement, and despite some resistance, it is now widely accepted that informal workers form a major part of the working poor.
The Report advocates for inclusion of informal workers within the reach of labour law and social protection. The Attorney General boycotted the hearing of the Appeal on 6 th December The Appellants proceeded in the absence of the Attorney General. Nonetheless the Respondent filed Reply to the Memorandum of Appeal, on 3 rd October , and filed Submissions on the date of the hearing, albeit after the hearing, on 6 th December The Reply to the Memorandum of Appeal largely agrees with the Appellants on the history of the dispute.
The Board advised the application be rejected as it was not clear who the Employers in the sector were. Registration would result in unhealthy competition and interfere with industrial stability. In her Submissions the Respondent alludes at paragraph 5, to an Order of the Court, which compelled her to issue the Appellants Certificate of Recruitment. The area of representation was adequately represented by TAWU.
The Appellants bear the burden of proving Employees in the sector are not sufficiently represented as held in the Seth Panyako Appeal cited above. The right to form a Trade Union under Section 4[1] of the Act, and under Article 41 of the Constitution, is not absolute. Article 24 allows limitation by law, of fundamental freedoms, to the extent that such limitation is reasonable and justifiable in an open and democratic society based on human dignity, equality and freedom, taking into account all the relevant factors.
The Court held Section 14 of the Act satisfies the requirements of Article 24 on limitation. There is justification in refusal to register a Trade Union which is intended for a sector that is adequately represented as held in Industrial Court at Nairobi, Petition Number 61 of between Wesley Tomno v Registrar of Trade Unions.
The Respondent prays for dismissal of the Appeal. The Appellants satisfied the requirements for registration under Section 18 of the Act. They paid the prescribed fee, forwarded their application for registration, accompanied by a copy of their union constitution, and certified copy of attendance register and minutes of the meeting at which their Trade Union was established. They did all the law pertaining to registration of Trade Unions, particularly under Section 12 and 18 of the Act, bids them to do.
The Respondent on her part made enquiries about the proposed Trade Union. On 18 th March , she advised the Appellants that Trade Unions, are formed on sector basis, with the intention of protecting the rights of their members in the given sector. The question posed by the Registrar to the Appellants was: whose interests do you intend to represent, and who are the Employers in this sector?
The Registrar was concerned that the Appellants had not shown whose interests they intended to represent, and had not shown who the Employers they were going to have industrial relations with were. The Appellants wrote to the Registrar on 26 th March Associations such as Three Wheelers Association have been formed by owners of these businesses. Employers who own these businesses are organizing.
Employees similarly need to be allowed to organize, to reap maximum benefit under the Constitution and the Act. The Registrar did not call for further clarification on the subject of Employers. Having met the conditions imposed on Applicants for registration, the Appellants were granted Certificate to enable them recruit Members, under Section 12 of the Labour Relations Act.
A large number of Workers were recruited from as far as Kisumu in Western Kenya, but mostly from Mombasa. Names of recruited Members were forwarded to the Registrar through a letter dated 6 th July It is agreed that once the Appellants forwarded their application for registration, the Registrar called for objection from interested Trade Unions, through Legal Notice Number of 14 th August There is nothing in the record to suggest that any objection was lodged from any Trade Union.
There was no objection lodged by TAWU, or any other player in the transport industry. It is stated in her Reply to the Memorandum of Appeal, that the Board advised the application is rejected as it is not clear who the Employers in the sector are. The grounds for refusal are stated in the Notification of Refusal of Registration, dated 20 th April It is clear that the Registrar did not mention in the Notification, that the Appellants proposed Trade Union could not be registered because there was another Trade Union called TAWU, representing the sector.
Registration was not denied because there is another Trade Union sufficiently representing the industry. It was denied on the grounds specified in the Notification of Refusal of Registration. It was a non-issue as far as the record shows. It should not have been an issue introduced by the Respondent later, at the point of appeal. None took up the invitation. Why then drag TAWU into the dispute while it does not claim to represent the area craved by the Appellants? The Court must entirely agree with the Submissions of the Appellants, that by bringing TAWU into the picture belatedly, the Registrar pivoted to the detriment of the Appellants.
There are other faults with the decision of the Registrar. First the Registrar appears to hold that it is the National Labour Board which is vested with the ultimate authority in determining whether a Trade Union should be registered or not. It advises the Minister on all matters of policy concerning employment and labour. It is an Advisory body, with no decisional or executive authority.
It does not therefore decide if a Trade Union should be registered, suspended, or de-registered. Section 19, of the Labour Relations Act, requires the Registrar to make an independent and impartial decision, upon consultation with the Board. The Board does not decide, but could perhaps offer the Registrar policy guidance. The decisional authority lies with the Registrar as concluded in Nairobi Appeal Number 10 of , referred to above.
The Board does not exercise executive, decisional role; the Registrar exercises executive and decisional role, and has been held in a catena of Judicial Authorities, to exercise a quasi- judicial function. While the Registrar is required to consult with the Board, the Registrar must not let the Board determine an application for registration of a Trade Union as appears to have happened in the Appeal filed herein.
It only requires the Registrar is satisfied, upon consulting the Board. In this Appeal, the Registrar informed the Appellants, on 20 th April that the Board did not approve. The Board, not the Registrar made the decision. That is not the intention of the law, in requiring there is consultation between the Registrar and the Board. The grounds given in the Notification of Refusal of Registration, whether the decision was made by the Respondent or the Board, are very weak and have no legal or policy justification.
Ground one was that the Appellants did not reveal who the Employers in the sector are. The Appellants are in the informal sector, and intend to represent informal workers. They were asked the same question in any case, by the Registrar and gave plausible answer in their letter of 6 th March There are other modes owned by persons other than their drivers and riders.
There are Employer groups in this area such as Three Wheelers Association. There are TAXI companies. The Respondent did not fully appreciate the informal nature of the sector sought to be represented by the Appellants. It would be difficult to register Trade Unions intended to represent informal workers such as House Helps, Jua Kali Artisans or Hawkers, if registration is hinged on revealing who their Employers are.
There are hidden and precarious employment relationships in the informal sector. The Court does not think it was right to expect the Appellants to disclose more material than they did in answering this query, and if such additional disclosure was required in any case, the Registrar should have called for it under Section 18 [3] [a] of the Labour Relations Act, before making a decision. The Appellants were not called by the Registrar or before the Board, and asked to give more evidence on, who the Employers in their desired area of representation are.
The Respondent erred by emphasizing preconditions which are not in the Labour Relations Act, and which ought not to be demanded of an informal economy. The International Labour Organization Resolution Concerning Decent Work and the Informal Economy adopted at the International Labour Conference in recognized and increased awareness on the need to organize informal workers.
More than half the world workers are in the informal economy. Formal employment has dwindled. Trade Union density has shriveled. It is therefore important, and in the interest of the Trade Union Movement, to have more informal sector Trade Unions. If workers in this economy are to enjoy social protection, and recognition under our labour law regime, they must be encouraged to organize and have a common voice.
The Notification of Refusal of Registration also states that the Appellants did not show who the Employers in the sector are for purposes of signing Recognition and Collective Bargaining Agreement. Trade Unions are established for many other reasons other than collective bargaining. Collective bargaining is a defining feature of trade unionism, but hardly the only feature.
Among the objects intended to be pursued by the proposed Union are these: secure organization of Members; protect interest of Members; regulate relations and settle disputes between Members; train Members; provide legal advice to Members; network with other Trade Unions including International Trade Unions; and promote the welfare of Members. Collective bargaining is just one of the myriad objects open for pursuit by a Trade Union. The view by the Registrar that the Appellants had not demonstrated who they were going to collectively bargain with, was a very restrictive view of freedom of association, and the right to organize.
Trade Unions exist for much more than collective bargaining. They represent their Members in Court, and have associational standing under our Constitution to move the Courts on behalf of their Members. They influence labour policy and participate in legislative processes.
Любой собственник жилого или нежилого помещения, расположенного в жилом доме, вправе обратиться с заявлением о признании дома аварийным. Далее, если межведомственная комиссия принимает решение о признании многоквартирного дома аварийным и подлежащим сносу, то соответствующий орган власти орган местного самоуправления принимает решение о сроках переселения граждан из занимаемых в данном доме помещений. Межведомственная комиссия может принять не только решение об аварийности дома и его сносе, но, и, например, о возможности проведения капитального ремонта или дать оценку конкретным жилым помещениям дома на предмет их соответствия обязательным требованиям пригодности для проживания в них граждан. На основании полученного заключения межведомственной комиссии, соответствующий орган исполнительной власти либо орган местного самоуправления обязан принять решение и издать распоряжение с указанием дальнейшего использования помещения, сроков отселения физических и юридических лиц в случае признания дома аварийным и подлежащим сносу или реконструкции или о непризнании необходимости проведения ремонтно-восстановительных работ. Если она бездействует не принимает решение о состоянии дома при наличии соответствующих обращений , гражданин вправе обжаловать такое бездействие в суд просить признать бездействие незаконным.
Порядок признания нежилого здания аварийным
New List. Select Existing. Mobile Nav Smithsonian. Pradeep Raja Kannaiah. Milan Sachs. Natural World. Prelena Soma Owen.
Судебные и нормативные акты РФ
С года у граждан России появилось право на приватизацию получение в собственность государственного жилья, в котором они проживали согласно договору социального найма. Но гражданин РФ может стать владельцем не только жилого дома, либо квартиры, но и нежилых помещений. Дорогие читатели! Статья рассказывает о типовых способах решения юридических вопросов, но каждый случай индивидуален.
ПОСМОТРИТЕ ВИДЕО ПО ТЕМЕ: Договор аренды нежилого помещения / адвокат про договор арендыСудебные и нормативные акты РФ. СудАкт в соцсетях. Верховный суд Арбитражные суды Суды общей юрисдикции Мировые судьи Законодательство Ответы на вопросы. Введите фамилию судьи. Очистить все. Решения судов, основанные на применении норм статей 22, 23 Жилищного кодекса Российской Федерации. Порядок перевода жилого помещения в нежилое помещение и нежилого помещения в жилое помещение перейти. Октябрьский районный суд г.
More stuff
Верховным Судом Российской Федерации проведено изучение судебной практики рассмотрения дел по спорам, связанным с обеспечением жилищных прав граждан в случае признания жилого помещения либо многоквартирного жилого дома непригодным для проживания, аварийным и подлежащим сносу или реконструкции. Изучение судебной практики показало, что в основном споры указанной категории возникают в связи с ненадлежащим исполнением органами местного самоуправления обязанностей, возложенных на них жилищным законодательством. В связи с этим судами рассматривались дела об оспаривании решений, действий бездействия органов местного самоуправления, межведомственных комиссий по вопросам, связанным с признанием жилого помещения непригодным для проживания, определением сроков расселения многоквартирных жилых домов, признанных аварийными и подлежащими сносу, о внеочередном предоставлении жилого помещения, о выселении, об обеспечении жилищных прав собственника жилого помещения в связи с изъятием земельного участка и жилого помещения в случае признания многоквартирного дома аварийным и подлежащим сносу, и другие споры.
Nevertheless, the complexity of the legal framework, the dominance of powerful economic groups, threats and physical attacks against candidates, and the fact that virtually all campaign coverage in the media was paid for all underscore the need for further reform. Additional efforts are needed to further enhance the integrity of and public confidence in the electoral process, the observers said. The observers stressed that the elections took place in a challenging political, economic, humanitarian and security environment, characterized by the illegal annexation of the Crimean peninsula by the Russian Federation and the temporary control of parts of the territory of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts by illegal armed groups. This made it impossible for more than 5 million voters in these areas to vote. Despite resolute efforts by the Central Election Commission CEC to organize elections throughout the country, they could not be held in parts of the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts or on the Crimean peninsula. Despite the lack of clarity in the procedural provisions in the election law, the voting and counting processes on election day were transparent and largely well organized in most of the country. Elections were not held in Mariupol, Krasnoarmiisk and Svavote. The printing and distribution of ballots proved problematic in many parts of the country. We will continue to assist and support the ambitious reform agenda in order for Ukraine to make further progress on its European path through the implementation of the Association Agreement. Voters had a wide array of parties and candidates to choose from and the campaign environment was competitive, although the resources provided by wealthy donors and associated business interests dominated mayoral and regional council races, in particular.
Войти на сайт
Следующая статья: Как выселить человека из квартиры. Первой и очень актуальной проблемой, которую можно увидеть практически в каждом современном городе по праву считается наличие ветхого и аварийного жилья. Дорогие читатели! Статья рассказывает о типовых способах решения юридических вопросов, но каждый случай индивидуален. Если вы хотите узнать, как решить именно Вашу проблему - обращайтесь к консультанту:.
Расселение аварийного дома, предоставление жилья. Судебная практика ВС РФ
Please Wait. The Appellants held a meeting on 25 th February at Mombasa, attended by over 50 Employees in the industry, and resolved to form and register their proposed Trade Union. They approached the Respondent and were issued a Certificate under Section 12 of the Labour Relations Act Number 14 of [hereinafter the Act], enabling them to recruit Members for purposes of establishing their Trade Union. Thereafter the Respondent issued Legal Notice Number on 14 th August under Section 14[1] of the Act, inviting objections to the registration of the proposed Trade Union. The Appellants presented all the requisite documents and paid the prescribed fee of Kshs. The Board unfortunately did not give its approval to registration. This decision is the subject of the Appeal. The Appellants submit the Respondent misapprehended the law on registration of Trade Unions.
В последнее время мы не умеем ни работать в паре, ни жить с партнёром. Помните такие теории, идущие от Платона? Я бы не спешила их отменять.
Как найти свою вторую половинку? Что нужно делать!
К участию в работе комиссии привлекается владелец нежилого здания и строения на праве хозяйственного ведения, оперативного управления, по договорам безвозмездного пользования, аренды, доверительного управления и др. Федеральный орган исполнительной власти создает в установленном им порядке комиссию для оценки жилых помещений жилищного фонда Российской Федерации. В состав комиссии включаются представители этого федерального органа исполнительной власти.
Реклама Рассылка Контакты Расширенный поиск. Показано с 1 по 5 из 5.
